In this article, the pros and cons of animal testing are examined. None of the thousands of experiments conducted on animals every year at universities are required by law. aims to reduce the amount of studies that involve mammal testing by 30 percent by 2025. Some claim there are no alternatives to animal testing, that it is necessary. But there are alternatives (mentioned above) and its not literally necessary that anyone do it: they can refrain. Lectures on the pros and cons of animal testing at Manchester It may seem funny to some people that testing genetically modified techniques on animals is right but in my eyes, it isn't. No animal or human self or forced volunteered should undergo testing for science. Pros Cons There are preferable alternatives to animal testing that are more accurate and humane. On the one hand, we have scientists who support experiments on animals to advance science. So, which side has the right idea? if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'environmental_conscience_com-banner-1','ezslot_4',144,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-banner-1-0');This has not only been true in the past, but will continue to be true also in the future of humanity. They even engage in acts of self-mutilation, including tearing out their own hair and biting their own flesh. Every year in the U.S., tens of millions animals suffer and die in chemical, drug, food, and product tests. The LibreTexts libraries arePowered by NICE CXone Expertand are supported by the Department of Education Open Textbook Pilot Project, the UC Davis Office of the Provost, the UC Davis Library, the California State University Affordable Learning Solutions Program, and Merlot. As an associate, I may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon or other programs. Read More. Experimenting on animals is not only cruel but also completely unnecessary and unethical. [ 1] [ 2] [ 3] 2. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'environmental_conscience_com-narrow-sky-1','ezslot_16',197,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-narrow-sky-1-0'); For instance, animals are often treated quite poorly and suffer from quite poor living conditions. They languish in pain, suffer from extreme frustration, ache with loneliness, and long to be free. is making decisions.. These Food and Drink Companies Refuse to Test on Animals. Animal testing helps ensure the safety of drugs and other substances that humans may be exposed to on a daily basis, such as cosmetics. You may argue that computer models have made tremendous advancements. Studies published in prestigious medical journals have repeatedly shown that animal experimentation wastes precious resources and lives. PETA makes it easy to take action to help animals suffering in experiments. Find all our Student Opinion questions here. Since our technological progress is quite rapid, we might be able to find better medical research methods in the future so that we no longer need to rely on animal testing. So, to see if a treatment works, a disease or injury must be created in animals. 12 Pros and Cons of Animal Testing On Cosmetics - Green Garage Wanna make a contribution to save our environment? PETAs searchable Global Beauty Without Bunnies list makes it easy to find cruelty-free companies that have committed to never testing their cosmetics or household cleaning products on animalshere or abroad. The state of the world will always be changing and in order to adapt to those changes, it is crucial that also our research continues to improve over time. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. Some argue that the benefits to humans justify animal testing. For this reason, researchers feel they had no choice but to use animals to better understand the human body and create practical products. The activity of animal testing is of cruelty and sometimes unscientific. Such long-term studies contribute highly to cancer research. Now lets take a look at the cons of animal testing. We actively campaign to get animals out of laboratoriesand win. Banning animal testing would save lives. Another downside of animal testing is that many people consider it to be a rather cruel practice. Well, they test the product on animals to ensure that there are no unpleasant surprises for customers. On Sept. 10, the Environmental Protection Agency said it would move away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals, a decision that was hailed by animal rights. Taking a look at our history can help us to understand what will happen in the future and this is also true in the area of medicine. Another issue of animal testing is that animals often have to suffer from plenty of pain during the trial period. This is probably one of the most significant benefits of animal testing. One important advantage of animal testing is that we will be better able to understand certain viruses and bacteria once we test their effects on animals. Most of the products tested on animals dont even make it to supermarkets. It helps minimize the chances of adverse human reactions, such as rash, itching, or even death, during human clinical trials. On the other hand, we have animal activists who feel that testing on animals is unethical. Some animals may die over the course of the experiment or be killed after their use, and others may lose their limbs, eyesight, hearing, muscle coordination, and so on. Accessibility StatementFor more information contact us atinfo@libretexts.org. This research also included plenty of animal testing and therefore, animal experimentation may have played a major role to increase our overall life expectancy as a global society and may also continue to do so in the future. Chimpanzees and humans share 99 percent of their DNA, and even mice and humans have a 98 percent overlap in this area. Thus, animals may be the organisms on our planet that are most similar to us humans and there might simply be no better trial group out there to test new treatment methods. However, I will not take any responsibility for incorrect information and will not be liable for any negative consequences that might occur due to the reliance on this information. One of the leading arguments against animal testing is that it is simply a waste of scientific energy and resources, because the results of tests done on other species often cannot be reliably extrapolated to humans. Should Animal Testing Be Banned - 1350 Words - Internet Public Library Therefore, animal research can not only help us humans, but findings from animal experimentation can also be quite useful when it comes to the treatment of diseases of animals of various sorts. 8.9: Abortion and Animal Rights- Does Either Topic Lead to the Other? Therefore, animal research isnt only beneficial to us humans. PETA International Science Consortium Ltd. end the practice of testing ingredients on animals, Fun Facts About Animal Mothers and How You Can Help Them, 250,000 Baby Ferrets Potentially Infected with Distemper at Marshall Farms, Campaign Updates: OHSU Mutilates Pigs in OB/GYN Medical Training. Some people may argue that animal testing is cruel and inhumane, but it is actually a very humane process. Opines that pharmaceuticals should be tested on animals as alternative methods don't allow for testing of effects across a whole organism. Should Animal Testing Be Banned? - 1570 Words | Studymode Unfortunately, the world of animal experimentation is rife with examples such as these. Although animal tests can provide us with a rough estimation regarding how certain medicines will affect human physiology, they might not be suitable to provide us with sufficient knowledge regarding the long-term effects of those drugs. As I went to university and got my Masters degree in Economics, I did plenty of research in the field of Development Economics. And more importantly, if my child were dying and I tried to experiment on my neighbors children to try to save my own child, that would be wrong. Animal testing refers to the practice of performing unnatural and often painful experiments on animals held captive in stressful laboratory settings, often in the misguided belief that the results of the tests will be applicable to humans. However, chances are that standardized processes will lead to a state where animal testing will be the main way to go and that it will be used in an excessive manner that may not be justifiable from an ethical perspective in the long run. Cant quite comprehend it? This is especially true for people who live in the poor part of our planet since they often do not have access to proper medical treatment or simply cannot afford it. Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, refers to procedures performed on living, non-human animals mainly used for researching and testing the effectiveness of medical procedures and products such as cosmetics, drugs, household cleaners, and food additives. Apart from the ethical concerns related to animal experimentation, there are also some financial problems related to animal research. The federal government and many health charities waste billions of dollarsincluding money from U.S. taxpayerson animal experiments at universities and private laboratories, instead of supporting promising non-animal studies that could actually benefit humans. It's unethical. Without further ado, here are animal testing pros and cons. We aim to provide self-care resources created by students for students and provide a platform where students can discuss health issues. Therefore, the long-term effects on humans may not be predictable at all from those animal experiments. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'environmental_conscience_com-mobile-leaderboard-2','ezslot_15',195,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-mobile-leaderboard-2-0'); It had been quite helpful over the course of human history to find certain medicines to treat serious diseases in the past and will also be helpful to treat potentially serious diseases in the future. Animal testing should be banned is all U.S laboratories due to cruel and painful procedures, unreliable results, and replaced with alternatives. On Sept. 10, the Environmental Protection Agency said it would move away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals, a decision that was hailed by animal rights groups but criticized by environmentalists and researchers who said the practice was necessary to rigorously safeguard human health. Animal experimentation has been done for many decades or even centuries. But scientists argue animal testing has been a crucial component in many medical breakthroughs, and as long as it's done ethically, animal testing should not be outlawed. Every day, mice, rats, cats, dogs, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, birds and primates are used. I definitely think we should be investing more in this research, she said, referring to alternative testing. A list of animal testing pros is incomplete without mentioning the main reason animal testing exists. Animal Testing Should be Banned - Medium Animal Testing Pros and Cons. Right now, animals in university laboratories are being mutilated, poisoned, deprived of food and water, immobilized in restraint devices, infected with painful and deadly diseases, burned, electrocuted, irradiated, addicted to drugs, and psychologically tortured.