It may be shorter wait to go inside. I come from a nosy profession, but we also value discretion. If you do a quick search of someones name and check out their LinkedIn profile, theres nothing wrong with reading it. To pull an example from the air that is certainly not my experience, sigh. And I say this as someone who (1) doesnt google coworkers, and (2) wouldnt like coworkers to google me. This isnt just about information that you yourself have posted. I really like my job overall and I work in a very specialized profession so I dont have many options and dont want to leave. After all, plenty of very experienced managers are bad managers. There is a certain level of fixation that can be inappropriate regardless of the source of the information. Information on _______ features is not the only thing that scientists get from EOS data. Or would you leave it up and ask them about it? How deeply you search also matters if youre reading someones high school live journal or all the Yelp reviews theyve ever written, youre in too deep. me either. This is like saying if you left your car unlocked, its your fault it was stolen. (Or the far worse victim shaming that happens. Anchovies on pizza were the best thing my mother-in-law and I had in common! We started around the same time. The CVs provide more detail about where theyve come from, how long theyve been working, who their networks are with. Thats true, but Im not losing any sleep over some guy who wanted to be a paramedic firefighter not getting a job as such because he posted, more than once, that all black people should die (amongst other things). Im allowed to know it, Im allowed to look it up, Im allowed to use it for legitimate contact purposes. Correct Answers: overheard news, profile, prescription bottle. The folks who think that Googling someones professional info are really confusing me. Maybe its not the right or nice thing to do, but, well, the internet is there, human curiosity knows no bounds, and rabbit-holing is a thing. Literally llama. There are plenty of perfectly legal behaviors that are nonetheless creepy. I knew of someone where their prior immigration status (think F-1 to OPT) was disclosed by a prev. #1, Companies do background checks all the time which can reveal far more than anything posted on Facebook, etc. If they google me to find out about my love of competitive butter carving, thats over the line. If youre searching for info on their personal life, thats an overstep does not so much apply. They left the company and emailed our team their private Facebook name for post-work connections I still usually use screennames that cant be easily traced back to me, and people were way more intense about it back in the aughts when we all thought posting your real name on the internet meant a crazed murderer would instantly show up outside your house. Probably a bit too far. CW sexual assault, and hopefully not too off topic. So treating the study-abroad employees is tricky. Privacy Awareness and HIPPA Privacy Training Flashcards | Quizlet Limited information is OK i.e. I also would count not having to walk back in the house and up the stairs to grab my must-have-cant-live-without-it travel mug of coffee as a welcome perk to remote work. No see thats creepy. do I need to wear nylons to a job interview or are bare legs OK? If you Google the names of my published papers, you will. Because Im a pragmatist when it comes to things like safety, and as my husbands driving instructor said about defensive driving If you wind up in the hospital, its not going to matter if you were right or not. It doesnt make it ok to run red lights, or to assault someone because its a dark nigh etc. Im sure you can find a better company for you. We make safe shipping arrangements for your convenience from Baton Rouge, Louisiana. They had warned me that due to their being a start-up they might not be able to offer competitive compensation, so I should not have been too surprised. That they asked me in person, then asked another coworker after I demurred, and made them LOOK IT UP IN THE PATRON DATABASE, then TAUNTED ME WITH THE INFORMATION, led to some unpleasant consequences. * Trust me, Ive tried. And while I agree that we shouldnt necessarily hold all internet behavior against people and that in the ancient internet days, yes people werent thinking about it turning into the internet of today, still Im always amazed what folks share publicly online. #1: About a decade ago some coworkers and I decided to Google each other. Or making an announcement enough in advance that if someone wants to come in for the free food, they can swap around their schedules. . Luckily the manager focused on their achievements and what they put in the resume, but woof am I grateful I have my facebook on lockdown. Free food always tastes good! And When you install this update, it will send alerts to everyone in your contacts about what song youre listening to and webpage youre looking at RIGHT NOW! Omigod turn that off. But you people said you wanted to use the web to connect.. We occasionally get HR notifications that such-and-such will be joining us in [capacity which will overlap with my role]. No, you do not. we use degrees of anonymity, but it is also important for us to build community with each other so yes we reveal some personal data, including location and sometimes photos. Yeah, thats real. Please dont. Yeah its definitely not rude, unless youre actually questioning their ability to do their job. As I said in the comment just above yours, I was simply responding to the notion that because something is publicly available its not creepy to dig for it. Sigh. (I cant get a beloved pizza place 2 miles from my house to deliver to me because their delivery area ends at the end of my block and they wont even meet me at the corner.). An update automatically sending connections for me to everyone everywhere with the slightest, most tenuous connection how many times removed, is a whole different thing and its not just creepy. The OP commented in another thread and said shes only looking up professional background stuff on LinkedIn so I wouldnt consider that snooping, but again, those are questions most people would have no problem with asking the person face to face. I mean, no ones going to argue with free Grubhub or a gift card occasionally and, trust me, its really awesome that youre thinking of them but most of them have probably weighed the perks of being in the office against the perks of being remote and know that sometimes, theyll miss out on the fun stuff of being in the office. (They do not tempt me to try it. Practically everything on social media is posted with express permission from the user., Facebook literally makes profiles of people who have never been on Facebook. I want to say to them, This training you are sending me to is stupid. If they google me to find out what kinds of llamas I have on my llama farm, thats over the line. Fist day of current job one of my coworkers looks at me and says You dont have Facebook we googled you last week. Its kind of the norm now. My manager confronted me after my workmate gave his notice. There is conversation happening all around you all the time that you could possibly pay attention to, but its not FOR you, and thats the difference. I think whats more important is what you do with that information if you happen to find it, not whether or not you looked it up. Besides, its a great way to bond with my coworkers and build networks. I had to calm her down, show her the thread, teach her how the whole dumb thing works, and show how it was a response. Think of the training as a couple light work break days where they (hopefully) provide lunch and networking. Why on earth make it harder to be trapped in an office with them sixty hours a week by knowing things that may make you dislike them or find them weird? Do these people live in town? Facebook has been notorious for smashing peoples privacy settings. Maybe John shouldnt be googling me, his coworker, but will he? I guess it depends on how deep and far you search. WWW didnt show up until 1991. Its a social media network meant for work purposes and it tells you whos seen your profile. That would be wrong. How to check in on your employees without being a snoop - Fast Company Its definitely retaliation. In a case like the above, the situation is such that he was out of line regardless and bringing into question the veracity of the blog post only serves to undermine the very legitimate reasons for firing that have been outlined. I also brought my laptop to the party and called him on Skype so he could hang out with everyone (which isnt really normally how we handle remote people usually we just do audio calls). Exactly. And then you have all of the hacks and data breaches that leave peoples data exposed. Bad Behavior Your coworkers might just be nosy, prying into your personal life and gossiping about you when you're not around. OP#1, I have always been of the opinion that unless someone elses immediate physical well-being in threatened, its always best to mind your own business. I think its kind of like gossip. So someone decided I was divorced and hiding it. A major false equivalency. That is on a whole other level. Its kind of a safety thing. They should expect it. And they are right. I recognize its probably different for college students. I think youre a good manager for thinking of it!. But if a coworker did that and you came across it ten years later, it is pretty basic common sense to realise that while you certainly *could* read through all their posts and learn a lot of personal information that they chose to put online, they probably would be embarrassed and a little weirded out if you actually did it and definitely would be if you brought it up at work. Usually happens when someone new gets hired and just want to know a little about them, also use this to look up some minimal information about new clients, etc.. Its one thing to dig through the caverns of the internet to get old information that a person may have no control over being public. https://www.amazon.com/BIC-Fashion-Retractable-Assorted-Fashion-FHAP21-ASST/dp/B005YGLA5Y. Instead, I found out that the boss daughter had been viciously murdered by her husband, and just what they could print in the paper was complete nightmare fuel. Eh. And hes very likely to scare anybody prone to being nervous. 9. If you search for my name, youll get a lot of noise. I also think a Starbucks gift card is a good idea and one that wont break the bank. It meets the legitimate work concern test. Theyre having a conversation in public where anybody can see and hear what theyre talking about. I dont share your experiences but there are party pictures with me that I didnt know was posted until much later. It sounded to me that some of the people are elsewhere on campus. But yeah, its not inherently problematic that the director doesnt know the detail of the job. Not a stalking a resume to avoid talking to someone situation. For #1, I think the key questions are Is it business-related? and Is it clearly intended as public knowledge?. Thats a big YIKES. You are in public and everyone can see what you do. I feel like this approach is sort of trying to logic people into not being uncomfortable, and thats just not really how human interaction works. Free food is great and all, but working remotely means I can have pizza in the oven ANYTIME I WANT. Even if right now info that is collected is aggregated at some point in the future it can become public (like usenet) or all it could take is a single hacker who is good enough to get access to all that info. That information could have been used against her in numerous ways. Right? It seems totally normal to me. Uh, no, Im just trying to do my job well. Agree. There are several people with the same name in our area and hes gotten numerous calls from parents wanting to know how to sign their child up for the baseball team or does he work on vehicles on the weekend, etc. A lot of my high school accomplishments were featured in the local paper which now has all its archives online. Its just that theres very little stop them from doing it if they are so inclined, just like theres very little to stop someone stealing stuff out of an unlocked car. Did they speak at an industry event? I think if that were to happen at the interviewing stage and the candidate was one of the top picks, it would make sense to have a woman interview them and evaluate if she felt safe with them or was getting weird vibes. We all posted a picture of us eating at whatever restaurant we chose on the Slack channel and talked about what we ordered. I fully understand why someone higher on the list of alt-right targets (LGBT, nonwhite, etc) would want to know before they ended up alone in the office with someone holding those views. Hey, said it in public right? The industry limit for the client is $50 per person per year and so thats our limit too (because we dont want clients to get in trouble.) Another problem is when your manager has no clue what real success looks like in the role. I think the fact that John and Jane Smith got divorced is public, but not the specific terms of the divorce decree and how they split up the assets. Im in corporate recruiting and often go beyond LinkedIn to check out someones professional presence, especially if they are SMEs or hold senior titles. And there can be good motivations and bad motivations. It would be a bigger deal if the department had a big event with gifts. Hmmm, what did you say your username was on FetLife again?. At least make sure theres no minimum delivery requirement. Its creepy they are allowed to do that. Seriously though, look for something else. There is such a thing as common sense and courtesy. Im not in favor of people googling candidates because you get to see their gender, race/ethnicity, and other things that can potentially color your unbiased view of a candidate (hiring ethics?). Thats a sign youre probably being a plain ole snoop. *I dont have, nor do I want/need to be part of the LinkedIn machine. I think the expectation of privacy was different on the early Internet. The brain does a whole ton of shortcuts, and then backfills logical rational reasons that was the objective, rational thing to do if you look at the question logically. So I would let it go for now, but then the next time youre going to use her as a reference, give her a heads up that she may be getting a call and also let her know that youre keeping your former salary confidential. Sometimes even with drink (I have no clue if it was coffee or not) in their hand. I mean, I liked that time I got a free meal from my employer when I was remote, but even then, the entire team was remote. My manager illogically picked one arbitrary, very broad metric that relies on about 6 other departments doing their job well as the measure of my success. Or someone who shares a name with someone who made it into the news. Now if I want to have privacy and dance around in a cow costume then I shut the blinds so no one can see. But it would never occur to me to feel like Im missing out on pizza. Maybe the reason it feels like you are questioning their ability is because you kinda are. I work remotely and at this stage in my career I dont care about missing free food, but I do like when they say hey take a long lunch or take a few hours this afternoon to celebrate since were having he holiday party/happy hour whatever. I work in higher ed, and have a staff of 25-30 part-time employees. colleagues should never snoop or look up information cvs. Of course they should. If they are looking for information on my butter carving competitions, thats over the line. (Although technically legal in themselves. I wouldnt want to talk to 20 people I dont know about this sort of thing and it would also be pretty time consuming. I think you are kind of using that as an excuse honestly. I personally fully believe that there is no such thing as online privacy from a risk management standpoint. Ive actually reverse image searched some people from LinkedIn something sometimes just seems really off with some people. Sometimes, your colleagues may present an idea to your team or make a decision about their career, and supporting them during these times can help you build a stronger relationship. Thats not how it works. Keeping your reading focused on professional material is a good boundary, but not all Twitter feeds, LinkedIn profiles, blogs, etc. I thought you meant personally! For Reasons, my twitter handle is a particular name. Probability goes up if youre in some minority categories particularly WoC and QPOC. cps drug testing law kentucky ratios of directed line segments formula If its public, you are publicly broadcasting it to where billions of people can potentially see it. And by she I meant s/he the director of alpaca exams. Think a former teapot painter managing the llama care department, and then not understanding that theres animal welfare guidelines for the care and keeping of llamas. The only exception might be if they actually said or did something that made me wonder. We are in the midst of hiring someone who was supposed to start this week. I have no idea what their value would be considered maybe 50 cents? He just wanted us to go away. People are not snooping and looking up things without your permission. Or maybe, would you be embarrassed if your colleague learned that you were looking them up like that? Im particularly thinking of I noticed so-and-so has been looking at my Instagram page when Im almost certain so-and-so thought they were doing this invisibly. Such reasons are theyre acting creepy or setting off that gut check response [another comment above here goes into an account of how their creep-radar went off and googling confirmed suspicions], they mention something in passing that makes you go Wait, what? If a coworker shares "work" with someone and a colleague shares the duties of an office for which they were "chosen" together, a companion is the person one shares "bread" (in Latin, panis) with. An accurate but cultivated one. Cool. should I wear my wedding ring to an interview, client demands unlimited time, and more. Its all risk and no reward. Everything else Ive tossed into a drawer and forgotten about, then been annoyed about having later. Usenet existed decades before the World Wide Web. Gift cards are always great though then you get what you want. I agree with what youre saying in principle, but letter #1 isnt about expectations of privacy vs. personal responsibility with posting google-able info online. Simply googling someone isnt an intensive search. Paying for a background check or doing a deep dive in some other way could be. The vibe you want to aim for is I dont want to bore you with details you already know instead of Prove your knowledge to me. Or youre getting the bio of Engineer Girls cousin, but figure that its the secret down low on Engineer Girl because what are the odds two people could be named Engineer Girl. A lot of social media is about getting more followers and having people see what you put on there. But for me, a line gets crossed when you start seeking out information that was not intended for the wider public, but for a more limited segment of the public. Crossing over into peoples 15 year old MySpace profile that hasnt been updated in forever to figure out what they were like in college is creepy. But if youre going to do it, you need to be very careful not to spread gossipat the risk of damaging their reputation, and your own. For consistency, this rule is in effect company wide, not just when working on government-related projects. Many times the individual did NOT post it online though. The search results could be something the new CW posted herself. LW 3: you sound all BEC with this job and company. Like if I found out they had a restraining order against them or multiple arrests or something. We just had to send her the receipt. LW 2: salary negotiation classes? Call it what it is, right? Without ever mentioning it to anyone who knows them, and might know someone who knows them? Work Colleagues: Definition and How To Communicate With Them In my last job my boss and I looked up the FB page of a candidate in our entity (I cant remember exactly why we did this, he was probably acting like a jerk though) and it turns out his page was filled with racist and homophobic posts. So, yeah. The OP for the letter that spawned this question had that info published about them but it didnt detail why it ended up not being a big deal. Its totally possible that this organization is just a poor fit, but maybe theres some feedback you can learn from in this crappy experience, too. Stop accepting a bad reality as just the way things are denounce it and dont participate in it. I dont know, I think that there can be times when youre a normal level of curious about another person but there isnt a good time/reason to ask them to go into it. But your motivation matters. Before I made my phone number private, I used to get calls all the time for people with the same first & last name as me. You are LITERALLY cultivating an online collection of data about yourself! Its funny but the swag capital of the world, the medical field has become anti swag, because of all the major scandals about drug reps bribing doctors a lot of areas no longer even permit pens and pencils, so asking is always good. Weve had almost 100% turnover in HR since this last time I pushed to get this policy changed. I do think, however, that references should have some idea of the positions/levels you are applying for, though I doubt that would have helped in this case. That could be anything from a Grubhub gift card and a note to get lunch on you, to stopping by with coffeefor the people elsewhere on campus (maybe do your next one-on-one on their turf and bring it with you), to sending them all some special treat, timed to arrive on the same day as the department pizza party. Thats the same reason there are so many political signs up at election time. Thats more damage control than idle curiosity, though. the director focuses much more on the areas under them which they understand and enjoy, and the person in the OPs position can understandably feel neglected. It just is. It doesnt even have to be the amount of time it takes. but Ill never negotiate against my own hire. But it would be creepy if they walked right up to your window and cupped their hands on the glass to peer in, or climbed up a tree to get a better view into the second level of your house, or used binoculars to get a closer look. One can hardly post details of their personal life online and then claim that anyone who sees it is pre-judging or not getting to know them. If youre googling relevant professional data for business purposes its fine, but if youre googling personal info (i.e., combing through court records and paid search sites) for non work related reasons youre crossing a boundary and invading their privacy. Yes, I hadnt thought of this but it definitely makes them a more flexible option! Does that mean you think that hiring managers and HR personnel all have people skills issues at the least and had some mental issue at the worst.? It is usually done for a specific purpose yes like a divorce case, or an insurance company trying to catch a potential scammer. I dont think that coworkers are googling me because I am not that interesting and they have more important things to do, but if I found out that a coworker had googled me or run a background check just out of sheer curiosity I would not be surprised. colleagues should never snoop or look up information cvsijoy aurora speaker how to pair. And I couldnt help thinking that my manager doesnt understand what I do was a bit of a strange complaint. what are the minimum benefits an employer needs to provide? Most places have an explicit dollar amount. Anything that requires detective work will make people wonder about your motivations. I am constantly receiving Starbucks giftcards that are of no use to me, since I dont drink coffee or tea. So it comes out nicely. ), You are absolutely right. But if you go much deeper, it starts to feel like a power play of some kind, particularly if you start dropping hints about what you know. I was an early Usenet user. And lots of things are on the internet with no input from use.g. That makes sense to do. If youre online and happen to come across something about a colleague I dont think thats a big deal. Everyone was in on it, and it was a hilarious, harmless few minutes of fun until a old newspaper article featuring my boss name turned up. I tried deflecting, but it hasnt worked. Its not illegal everywhere, so it still happens, but I think its generally falling out of practice, which is good. Its something that used to be very common but is now less-so. Its interesting that food and drink are acceptable but not pens. I think those that are saying we shouldnt be googling coworkers are probably right, but its really not a question of should vs. shouldnt, but will vs. wont. If I want to ask her to provide other recommendations for me, I need to remain in her good graces, and on the other hand, if I dont provide her name as a reference, there are sure to be questions about why. I would eat so much better if I werent limited to what is most convenient to throw in a bag or assorted eateries around the office. Nah, these are presentations being given on your lunch time, so its fine for you to take that stuff home if you want to. LW4: Whether or not you can keep the freebies may depend somewhat on your job function. If youre trying to find out everything about their life, thats over the line. What if *you* didnt put it up? Especially when you add in that one of the reasons you are doing so is to win disagreements. We have done inexpensive promo gifts and stuff other surprise goodies in our product packages for promotional reasons as well. Im black myself, I cant say Ive ever felt the need to look at co-workers personal pages under the guise of safety. Frankly if I knew you were googling my resume instead of just asking me I would probably think you had people skills issues at the least and had some mental issue at the worst. IDGAF really what they are online, what matters is how they interact with me every day at work. I see a lot of companies that are like oh remote working IS the perk, so who cares about all the great stuff we offer in-office employees? this makes me sad, so if you are fiscally able, try to offer comparable perks to your remote employees! Ive Googled people. #5 agreed free food is good! I would never say it out loud, and wouldnt hold it against the remote worker, but Id be a little annoyed if I got a couple slices of pizza to eat in a conference room or at my desk while a remote worker got a $20 GrubHub card. I do think it can happen (though it shouldnt) i.e. I looked online and saw that there was an Insomnia Cookies near him, so I ordered some to be delivered to him a few minutes before the party. Practically everything on social media is posted with express permission from the user. Thats super petty, but also kind of hilarious. Do you have advice on something thoughtful I can do in these situations? No, in many cases social media is normal parts of someones work personal as well. (To be clear, Im not saying that posting that level of identifiable personal information online isnt stupid or that coworkers should never Google each other or whatever. How can I be fair to remote team members when I bring in pizza for my on-site staff? Look, if Im talking to young people or folks who are still finding their way with social media or the like (and there are a LOT of them, and not all old), Id be very, very clear about the need to lock down your data, be careful about what you post, etc. There are levels of publicly broadcast, though. So while I probably wouldnt google a coworker, I wouldnt write it off completely for interns or employees if there are other reasons to be concerned about what may be coming up online that may impact the organization. the gift of the nile colleagues should never snoop or look up information cvs I would feel comfortable saying ^ in front of them and our boss, so it makes sense. Having said that, paying someone to do a deep dive? My husband loves them on his pizza however. But honest questionif youre working with someone on a regular basis (like the technical person you describe) why wouldnt you just ask them about their background to get a better sense of who youre dealing with? As an ex best friend of a jealous snooper, its important to recognize what is done with the information. People know their information is online; that doesnt mean that its expected that people they know in person will try to find information about them from google instead of by asking/getting to know them personally. After that news, I talked to my former supervisor, who was also laid off, about my disappointment. Probably some sort of relative of the HR gal, but none of my business and certainly not worth alerting anyone about. 2. *eye roll*. I am astounded by the supervisors naivete! But now that I am making better wages, I dont really care if there is pizza or cake in the office while I am working remotely. Information in the public domain is public. Getting a gift card to spend money with just your family and/or friends instead of with coworkers :), I think it actually is slightly more complicated when the people are remote.
All Of These Are Reasons For Probate Except Quizlet, Articles C