A Modified QuickDASH-9 Provides a Valid Outcome Instrument for Upper Limb Function. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. ; Seo, K.S. 0000082422 00000 n Am J Occup Ther 2011,65(2):169178. Estimating the Reliability and Validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery. A total of 216 voluntary BCS from Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital of Malaga participated in the study. The determined values were satisfactory and supportive of the findings of the ULFI as a 3-point scale, particularly in the areas of internal consistency, factor structure and reliability. 2021 Sep 20;18(18):9894 (Full text article) Spanish: The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). The main objective of the study was to translate and validate the upper limb functional index (ULFI) outcome measure in the Urdu language. 0000098321 00000 n Liebenson, C. (2007). 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060, Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C: Measuring the whole or the parts? 0000076521 00000 n ; Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M.W.G.N. Several other regional PROs are also advocated. However, CFAs factor analysis revealed a poor fit, and a new 14-item model was tested from those items with higher communalities (, The original version of the ULFI-Sp has a high internal consistency ( = 0.94) validated in patients with variable alterations of the upper limb [, Similarly, reduced versions of DASH (30 items), QuickDASH (11 items), and QuickDASH of 9 items (QuickDASH-9) have been developed in patients with upper limb musculoskeletal conditions [, One of the strengths of the present study was that factor analysis by CFA was tested. %PDF-1.3 ; Osborne, J.W. The UEFI-15 is recommended because it measures only one dimension: UE function. 0000075019 00000 n (PDF) Upper Extremity Functional Index - ResearchGate All the authors have given final approval of the version to be published. Conclusions: Given the high prevalence of ULD in this population and the broader versions of ULFI across different languages, this study's results may be transferred to clinical practice and integrated as part of upper limb assessment after breast cancer. Torres-Lacomba, M.; Snchez-Snchez, B.; Prieto-Gmez, V.; Pacheco-da-Costa, S.; Yuste-Snchez, M.J.; Navarro-Brazlez, B.; Gutirrez-Ortega, C. Spanish Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and the Oxford Shoulder Score after Breast Cancer Surgery. Man Ther 2011,16(2):177182. A Prospective Surveillance Model for Physical Rehabilitation of Women with Breast Cancer: Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Schropp L, Cats RB, de Kleijn RJCMF, van Hattum ES, Middeldorp S, Nijkeuter M, Westerink J, Petri BJ, de Borst GJ; Upper Extremity PTS group. 0000075733 00000 n The ULFI was shown to have strong psychometric properties for reliability, validity, responsiveness, error measurement, and internal consistency that approximated or exceeded those of the DASH and UEFS [6]. 0.95 in a sample of upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions,1 and ICC 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.92) in a sample with shoulder, elbow, wrist and forearm musculoskeletal conditions. Harris, S.R. Up to two missing responses are permitted [7]. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish ; Marshall, P.W.M. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of "Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 10.2522/ptj.20100199, Lehman LA, Sindhu BS, Shechtman O, Romero S, Velozo CA: A comparison of the abiity of two upper extremity assessments to measure change in function. The ULFI is a 25-item 3-point response option PRO that is scored by simple addition of the responses then converted to a 100 point percentage scale. Factor structure was one-dimensional and supported construct validity. ; McNeely, M.L. 0000078184 00000 n The one-factor solution that emerged in the factor analysis accounted for a significant proportion of variance and showed evidence that supports the presence of construct validity. Angst, F.; Schwyzer, H.-K.; Aeschlimann, A.; Simmen, B.R. methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. Qual Life Res 2009,18(8):10431051. Measurement error was determined from SEM and MDC90 being respectively at 3.52% and 8.03%. A potential source of bias was that the scales were provided always in the same order. }Z:d2]l@sS$2fQBQE&0bNJ-%+(5s6`[RbP=u[[bl=. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Greek Version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index. 0000073533 00000 n Le coefficient de corrlation intracatgorie (CCI) et le changement dtectable minimal (CDM) ont quantifi la fiabilit de testretest (moment 1moment 2). (This article belongs to the Special Issue. Med Care. ; Yelland, M.; Melloh, M.; Burkett, B. 10.1157/13093053. Distribution and normality were determined by one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests (significance >0.05). ; Bot, S.D.M. Their presenting conditions and diagnoses were broadly classified into five categories (Table1). Unfallchirurg 2003,106(13):19. Clinicians may assess the upper limbs after breast cancer. Schmitz, K.H. Qual Life Res 1995, 4: 491. Participants (n=126) with various upper limb conditions of >12weeks duration completed the ULFI-Sp, QuickDASH and the Euroqol Health Questionnaire 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-3L). ; Knol, D.L. All questionnaires were completed and two assessors performed the initial and any subsequent assessments, but were blinded to baseline scores in order to ensure independent collection of outcome data. 0000158137 00000 n Future studies should include a more significant BCS sample, allowing for segmenting data for an MLE and CFA analysis. 0000157145 00000 n Psicothema 2013, 25: 151157. The upper limb functional index is broadly used outcome measure for musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Kaiser, H.F. An Index of Factorial Simplicity. 18, No. Psychometric Development of the Upper Limb Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Demonstrated the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Be a Robust Measure for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema. Book 0000079974 00000 n An official website of the United States government. Value Health. Part of Today, do you or would you have any difficulty at all with: The exclusion criteria were under 18 years old and low reading comprehension due to completing the questionnaire. 10.1007/s00264-007-0344-7, Article 2015;28(3):489-95. doi: 10.3233/BMR-140545. Med Clin (Barc) 1999, 112: 7985. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Measures of Adult Shoulder Function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and Its Short Version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). CAS 0000080800 00000 n A factor analysis showed one factor with an Eigenvalue of 6.7; this factor explained 61% of the variance. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-126, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-126. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. Criterion validity with the EQ-5D-3 L was fair and inversely correlated (r = -0.59). This is through their respective institutional websites and subject related Journals. 2014 May 17;12:75. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-75. 2019). Background: The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. Two of the three other critical psychometric properties of the ULFI-Sp were both shown to be high and well supported. ; Roldn-Jimnez, C. Ultrasound Use in Metastatic Breast Cancer to Measure Body Composition Changes Following an Exercise Intervention. Pajares B, Roldn-Jimnez C, Alba E, Cuesta-Vargas AI. The chi-square test was used to show differences between observed covariance and expected matrices. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal It has five 3-point response options for different quality-of-life dimensions and a sixth question on overall perceived health-related status. Occup Environ Med 2002,59(10):664670. The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). ; van der Wees, P.J. There are several regional upper limb PROs that are advocated and recommended by national associations or organizations around the world for Physical, Occupational and Hand Therapy, Orthopedics and Surgery. The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) is a 20-item, region-specific PROM initially designed to assess upper extremity function in people with musculoskeletal disorders (17, 18). The scale is in logits. A KayserMeyerOlkin (KMO) Measure of Sampling Adequacy (>0.70) [, Construct validity and factor structure were determined through the use of Maximum Likelihood Extraction (MLE), with the requirements for extraction being the satisfaction of all three points: scree plot inflexion point, Eigenvalue > 1.0, and accounting for > 10% of the variance [, ULFI internal consistency was evaluated by Cronbachs coefficients calculated at an anticipated value range of 0.800.95 [, Correlation between items and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was made to test whether measures of a construct are consistent with this constructs nature. Ethical clearance was approved by the Tribunal of Review of Human Subjects at the University of Malaga. Writingoriginal draft preparation: J.M.-M. When referring to upper extremity musculoskeletal impairments, this concerns the shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand areas. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010,91(9):13701377. Hervs MT, Navarro Collado MJ, Peir S, Rodrigo Prez JL, Lpez Matu P, Martnez Tello I: panish version of the DASH questionnaire. Aytar A, Yuruk ZO, Tuzun EH, Baltaci G, Karatas M, Eker L. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. Cross-cultural adaptation of the upper limb functional index in Arabic. An external validation scale of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L-VAS was used with bilateral correlations to establish if status had changed and an error range of 010% was allowed in determining the test-retest reliability. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.02.008. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. 2002;5:372381. Jill M. Binkley, Paul Stratford, Stephanie Kirkpatrick,Clara R. Farley, Joel Okoli, Sheryl Gabram Estimating the Reliability and Validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery. The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) is a patient reported outcome measure used to assess the functional impairment in individuals with musculoskeletal upper limb dysfunction. Morris LA, Miller DW. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Clinimetrics: Upper Extremity Functional Index - Western University Psychometric properties were evaluated following Costello and Osborne [, Although previous PROs have been validated in BCS [, In the present study, the KMO showed that the ULFI was suitable for an EFA analysis. 0000076601 00000 n %PDF-1.3 Any study using confirmatory factor analysis would be advantageous. Conclusions: Spanish Version of SPADI (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index) in Musculoskeletal Shoulder Pain: A New 10-Items Version after Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The Oxford Shoulder Score Revisited. This indicated that the correlation matrix was unlikely to be an identity matrix and was therefore suitable for PCA. 0000155188 00000 n Modification of the Upper Limb Functional Index to a Three-Point Response Improves Clinimetric Properties. Would you like email updates of new search results? 0000071512 00000 n Health outcome assessment is an important component of patient care. Des courbes des caractristiques oprationnelles du rcepteur (COR) ont estim la pDMCI partir des scores de changement entre le moment 1 et le moment 3 et les EGC moyennes patient/thrapeute. On recommande le questionnaire IFMS-15 parce qu'il mesure une dimension seulement: la fonction des membres suprieurs. articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without Cuesta-Vargas, A.I., Gabel, P.C. Gabel CP, Michener LA, Burkett B, Neller A: The Upper Limb Functional Index: Development and Determination of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Trials. Prevalence of Breast Cancer Treatment Sequelae over 6 Years of Follow-up: The Pulling Through Study. This notably high level, when taken in context with the presence of the factor structure item loading Eigenvalues above 1.0, would indicate the potential for a shortened version of this tool. A two stage observational study was conducted. Health Qual Life Outcomes 11, 126 (2013). The psychometric properties were as follows: analysis of the factor structure by maximum likelihood extraction (MLE), internal consistency, and construct validity by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). 0000005162 00000 n The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) is a self-administered questionnaire which measures disability in people with upper extremity orthopaedic conditions. The site is secure. Arooj A, Amjad F, Tanveer F, Arslan AU, Ahmad A, Gilani SA. 0000098017 00000 n Epub 2013 Jun 27. Roldn-Jimnez, C.; Martn-Martn, J.; Pajares, B.; Ribelles, N.; Alba, E.; Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. Hu, L.; Bentler, P.M. The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a recent example of this. Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor. Gabel, C.P. [1] The original UEFI consists of 20 questions on a 5- point rating scale assessing level of difficulty in performing activities of daily living using the upper extremities including household and work activities, hobbies, lifting a bag of groceries, washing your scalp, pushing up on your hands, driving etc. Hidding, J.T. Med Care 45(5):S3-S11. Methods: A psychometric validation study of the ULFI-Sp was conducted on 216 voluntary breast cancer survivors. Possible range on the UEFI 20-item from 0 80 with 0 indicating lowest functional status and 80 indicating highest functional status. Reliability and validity of two versions of the upper extremity functional index. Value Health 2004, 7: 48. Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI. Both UEFI measures show acceptable reliability and validity. 0000075496 00000 n The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 1173185, Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Stratford DM. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Pascariello B, Ferriero G. Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH): a factor analysis and Rasch validation study.To perform a comprehensive psychometric analysis of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) to examine its properties and provide insights for an improved . Positive minimal clinically important difference values were 8/80 for the UEFI-20 and 6.7/100 for the UEFI-15; pMCID was higher for people whose non-dominant arm was affected. MDC values were 9.4/80 for the UEFI-20 and 8.8/100 for the UEFI-15. Wiley: Chichester; 2000. [, Although there are several short versions of questionnaires to measure upper limb function in the literature [, Other questionnaires, such as SPADI, have been integrated as part of an early warning surveillance system to detect ULD in BCS [. 0000081478 00000 n The Validation of a Quality of Life Scale to Assess the Impact of Arm Morbidity in Breast Cancer Patients Post-Operatively. Karanasios S, Kampourakis G, Ntoulaveris I, Kouvaras K, Lignos I, Diamantopoulos N, Gioftsos G. Cureus. When refering to evidence in academic writing, you should always try to reference the primary (original) source. The ULFI-Sp is a valid upper limb outcome measure with similar psychometric properties to the English language version. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012, Lehman LA, Woodbury M, Velozo CA: Examination of the factor structure of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. 0000153714 00000 n This cross-sectional study recruited a population of female BCS to evaluate the psychometric properties of ULFI in terms of structural validity, reliability, and factor analysis. The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI): cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version. << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. X qz>'tqm_]Mq0C In light of the present results, the developed version of the ULFI-SP is preferable to assess the upper limb function in Spanish women after breast cancer surgery. However, the UEFI-15 item is scored 0-59 and converted to give an interval level total score 0-100 with 0 indicating worst state and 100 best state. ROC curve; outcome assessment; physiology; reproducibility of results; upper limb. The ULFI with a three-point option improved both the responsiveness and practicality [7]. Development and Initial Validation of a New Regional Outcome Measure: The Upper Limb Disability Questionnaire (ULDQ), 2003. 10.2106/JBJS.J.01744. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the ; de Vet, H.C.W. 0000074054 00000 n Not only a direct and reverse translation methodology was applied, also a specialist in the field as detailed and recommended in the specialized scientific literature (Figure1) [43, 44]. Physiother Can 2004, 56: 2730. Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. The test-retest reliability or reproducibility was also high with the values (0.92 to 0.95) in-line with those found for the original instrument (0.90 to 0.96) [8]. The upper extremity functional index evaluates the impairment the subject perceives they encounter when performing 20 types of activities of daily living. 0000000016 00000 n ; Bartlett, M.S. An index close to 0.95 was considered acceptable, while an index of 0.97 was considered indicative of a good fit [, Factor structure by MLE was carried out with the software Statistical Package Social Science Version 25.0 (SPSS 25.0) [, BCS were aged 51.64 (9.10). 0000155126 00000 n The site is secure. The psychometric properties, specifically construct and criterion validity, reliability and internal consistency were determined independently and found to be strong and the single factor structure indicated that a single summated score could be used [25]. A study by Binkley et al[2] supported the use of UEFI in patients after breast cancer surgery. The effect of arm dominance on the positive minimal clinically important difference (pMCID) has not been determined for both versions of UEFI. MDC values were 9.4/80 for the UEFI-20 and 8.8/100 for the UEFI-15. Subjects were asked to fulfil the questionnaire as part of an assessment. 0000004613 00000 n Differences in Tridimensional Shoulder Kinematics between Asymptomatic Subjects and Subjects Suffering from Rotator Cuff Tears by Means of Inertial Sensors: A Cross-Sectional Study. ; Bombardier, C. Development of an Upper Extremity Outcome Measure: The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) [Corrected].
Usps Arrow Key Template, Articles U